← Back To All Posts
Date:
September 25, 2020

Exploring The Mulan Controversy

Disney’s new film “Mulan” has become a worldwide sensation, but not for the reasons one might think. The live-action film has generated an unusual amount of political debate. “Mulan,” directed by  Niki Caro,  is Disney’s remake of its 1998 animated film, based on the classic Chinese ballad. Due to the pandemic, the studio released the film on its streaming service Disney+, with plans to screen the film theatrically in countries where cinemas are open.

After keeping quiet calls to boycott the film dominated social media, top Disney brass admitted that a string of controversies created issues for the studio. During a virtual conference , chief financial officer Christine McCarthy discussed the challenges faced by Disney before and after the release of the film.

How does an innocent remake of an animated classic explode into a social media nightmare for a studio specializing in family fare? In this case, several things went wrong for Disney.

The Hong Kong Protests Controversy

In February 2019, China introduced a contentious extradition bill which allowed criminals to be transferred freely between Hong Kong, Taiwan, Macau and mainland China. Critics feared that the bill would be exploited to allow Hong Kong to send criminal suspects to mainland China. The people of Hong Kong saw it as one more attempt by the Chinese Communist Party to encroach on its freedom. Citizens protested strongly and the anti-extradition bill movement evolved into a pro-democracy movement . In retaliation, the Hong Kong Police used aggressive force to discourage protesters which increased the divide between the Hong Kong police and citizens.

Amid the protests, notable Chinese figures such as Jackie Chan and Liu Yifei , among others, voiced their support for both the Chinese government and the Hong Kong police. Liu, a naturalized American citizen, is the lead character who plays Mulan. She shared a meme which was construed as support for the Hong Kong police. It did not take long for the post to circulate and spark backlash from pro-democracy supporters. With that, the call began for a boycott of “Mulan” and #BoycottMulan started to trend in several countries. The second problem for “Mulan” is its filming location.

The Uighur Dispute

It appears parts of “Mulan” were filmed in Xinjiang , China, two years ago. Viewers noticed this in the credits when Disney thanked eight government bodies in Xinjiang, a western province in China where around  2 million Uighur Muslims  have been allegedly forced into concentration camps by the Chinese government. The film credits specifically praise the police security bureau in  Turpan , a city in eastern Xinjiang with a large Uighur population. Experts say that bureau is  tasked with running some of the internment camps and was  blacklisted  last year by the U.S. Commerce Department.

The outcry over the filming location now includes U.S. lawmakers . Politicians from both parties have already  criticized China  over a range of issues in the run-up to the November 2020 elections. American politicians fired off vehement missives against Disney. Representative Mike Gallagher, Republican of Wisconsin,  tweeted  that “while the CCP is committing crimes against humanity in Xinjiang,  @Disney  thanked four of the propaganda departments that are lying to the world about these crimes. It also thanked the Turpan Public Security Bureau, which is on the entity list for its role in these atrocities.”

Reactions Against Direct to Streaming Release

Even in Europe, the strife doggedly follows “Mulan.” The news that Disney  would bypass cinemas by premiering “ Mulan ”  directly onto Disney+  provoked a furious backlash from international exhibitors who felt the studio was declining support in times of need. In France, Gerard Lemoine, a frustrated theater owner, displayed his anger with Disney’s decision in an extreme fashion. Lemoine, who owns the French indie venue Cinepal in Palaiseau, posted a video of him destroying “Mulan” pop-up art via Twitter. Lemoine’s video has over 328K views and the post received a substantial amount of replies.

Cultural Dissonance

Though Disney did its best to create a film that that would appeal to China, many Chinese viewers rejected the film as offensively inauthentic. “The Americans invited all the famous Chinese actors they could think of and piled together all the Chinese elements that they could find to create this car crash,” reads one of the most popular reviews . “It’s full of Western stereotypes and conjectures about China, and particularly ancient China.”

Many viewers in China felt that Disney’s new heroine starts out from childhood already equipped with superhero-like abilities, thanks to her extraordinary reserves of “qi.” While Chinese viewers are familiar with the concept of “qi,” they are puzzled by Disney’s take on the vital energy traditionally considered to underlie the practice of Chinese medicine and martial arts, asking: “What exactly is ‘qi’ here?”- hinting that concepts were applied without any real understanding of the cultural roots.

“Mulan,” much like “ Crazy Rich Asians ” was initially celebrated in the West for being a landmark for Asian American representation, due to its all-Asian cast . Yet many of the elements included to boost its cultural resonance have not succeeded in appealing to its target mainland audience.

One viewer wrote that the script’s constant repetition of the terms “loyal, brave and true” felt like “ a Google Translate take on Chinese .” In one scene, Mulan throws away all her protective armor in the middle of a battle. To the ethnic audience, the choice is obviously nonsensical, but it is also highly unfilial, since the garb is a treasured heirloom from her father.

Chinese audience members are familiar with the original ballad in its classical Chinese. They intimately know final lines — an allegory for gender equality that male and female rabbits look identical when running side by side. Numerous respondents laughed at how the film presents this by having the young heroine spot two rabbits in a field and commenting on how she could not determine their gender, calling the moment one of “forced East-West fusion.”

Once again, “Mulan” clearly demonstrates Hollywood’s lack of detail and accuracy in its attempt to bridge the cultural gap between the East and the West.

Disney’s chief financial officer Christine McCarthy said, in her statement addressing the criticism, “Let me just put something into context. The real facts are that “Mulan” was primarily shot — almost entirely — in New Zealand.” She continued, “In an effort to accurately depict some of the unique landscape and geography of the country of China for this period drama, we filmed scenery in 20 different locations in China.” McCarthy then explained, “It’s common knowledge that to film in China, you have to be granted permission. That permission comes from the central government. So, in our credits, it recognized both China and locations in New Zealand. I would just leave it at that, but it has generated a lot of issues for us.”

Authorities in China recently ordered media outlets not to cover “Mulan’s” release in China. While no official reason is given, reports conclude the international backlash relating to Xinjiang is likely the major cause.

Related Insights

YouTube Thumbnails Can Get You in Trouble

Here’s Why Creators Should Pay Attention

When we talk about content compliance on YouTube, most people think of the video content itself — what’s said, what’s shown, and how it’s edited. But there’s another part of the video that carries serious consequences if it violates YouTube policy: the thumbnail.

Thumbnails aren’t just visual hooks — they’re promos and they’re subject to the same content policies as videos. According to YouTube’s official guidelines, thumbnails that contain nudity, sexual content, violent imagery, misleading visuals, or vulgar language can be removed, age-restricted, or lead to a strike on your channel. Repeat offenses can even result in demonetization or channel termination. That’s a steep price to pay for what some may think of as a simple promotional image.

The Hidden Risk in a Single Frame

The challenge? The thumbnail is often selected from the video itself — either manually or auto-generated from a frame. Creators under tight deadlines or managing high-volume channels may not take the time to double-check every frame. They may let the platform choose it automatically. This is where things get risky.

A few seconds of unblurred nudity, a fleeting violent scene, or a misleading expression of shock might seem harmless in motion. But when captured as a still image, those same moments can trigger YouTube’s moderation systems — or worse, violate the platform’s Community Guidelines.

Let’s say your video includes a horror scene with simulated gore. It might pass YouTube’s rules with an age restriction. But if the thumbnail zooms in on a blood-splattered face, that thumbnail could be removed, and your channel could be penalized. Even thumbnails that are simply “too suggestive” or “misleading” can get flagged.

Misleading Thumbnails: Not Just Clickbait — a Violation

Another common mistake is using a thumbnail that implies something the video doesn’t deliver — for example, suggesting nudity, shocking violence, or sexually explicit content that never appears in the video. These aren’t just bad for audience trust; they’re a clear violation of YouTube’s thumbnail policy.

Even if your content is compliant, the wrong thumbnail can cause very real problems.

The Reality for Content Creators

It’s essential to recognize that YouTube’s thumbnail policy doesn’t exist in isolation. It intersects with other rules around child safety, nudity, vulgar language, violence, and more. A thumbnail with vulgar text, even if the video is educational or satirical, may still result in age restrictions or removal. A still frame with a suggestive pose, even if brief and unintended in the video itself, can be enough to get flagged.

And for creators monetizing their work, especially across multiple markets, the risk goes beyond visibility. A flagged thumbnail can reduce ad eligibility, limit reach, or cut off monetization entirely. Worse, a pattern of violations can threaten a channel’s long-term viability.

What’s a Creator to Do?

First, you need to know how to spot the problem and then know what to do about it. Second, you need to know if the changes you make might affect its acceptance in other markets or countries. Only then can you manually scrub through your video looking for risky frames. You can review policies and try to stay up to date on the nuances of what YouTube considers “gratifying” versus “educational” or “documentary.” But doing this at scale — especially for a growing content library — is overwhelming.  

That’s where a tool like SpherexAI can help.

A Smarter Way to Stay Compliant

SpherexAI uses frame-level and scene-level analysis to flag potential compliance issues — not just in your video, but in any frame that could be selected as a thumbnail. Using its patented knowledge graph, which includes every published regulatory and platform rule, it will prepare detailed and accurate edit decision lists that tell you not only what the problem is, but also for each of your target audiences. Whether you're publishing to a single audience or distributing globally, SpherexAI checks your content against YouTube’s policies and localized cultural standards.

For creators trying to grow their brand, monetize their work, and stay in good standing with platforms, that kind of precision can mean the difference between success and a takedown notice.

Want to know if your content is at risk? Learn how SpherexAI can help you protect your channel and optimize every frame — including the thumbnail. Contact us to learn more.

Read Now

Automating Peace of Mind: Navigating YouTube's Global Guidelines with SpherexAI

For media companies distributing content across YouTube, compliance is no longer just a legal requirement—it’s a prerequisite for discoverability, monetization, and channel survival. YouTube enforces strict policies governing child safety, vulgarity, graphic content, and cultural sensitivity. For content owners, ensuring compliance across multiple categories and geographies is a complex and labor-intensive process. To address this issue, SpherexAI provides a scalable solution tailored for any content creator or owner.

YouTube’s Expanding Compliance Landscape

YouTube’s Community Guidelines cover a wide array of regulated categories. Content can be removed or age-restricted—and creators may face penalties—if videos violate policies on:

  • Nudity and sexual content: Content that includes sexually gratifying imagery or non-consensual sexualization is prohibited.
  • Violence and graphic imagery: Footage showing serious injury, bodily fluids, or torture intended to shock viewers can be flagged or removed.
  • Child safety: Content that exploits minors, includes inappropriate family content, or features children in dangerous stunts is not allowed.
  • Illegal or regulated goods: YouTube restricts promotion of firearms, narcotics, and gambling services, among others.

Managing compliance with each of these categories—especially when content is global and multilingual—is a logistical challenge for distributors.

Enter SpherexAI: Precision Compliance Automation at Scale

SpherexAI applies multimodal AI to analyze video content across dialogue, visuals, audio, and metadata. It detects compliance issues not only by scanning for policy violations but also by identifying subtle cultural or regional sensitivities that could result in content removal or limited distribution.

For example, the platform flags:

  • Dialogue with excessive profanity or sexual references, aligned with YouTube’s vulgar language policy.
  • Visuals showing partial nudity, firearm use, or dangerous stunts, which may trigger strikes or age restrictions.
  • Culturally sensitive depictions—such as religious imagery or portrayals of death—that may violate local norms and platform rules.

SpherexAI outputs include timestamped alerts and severity levels, allowing content owners to make targeted edits rather than performing full manual reviews.

Equal Rules for All Creators

Whether you’re a major studio releasing film clips or a digital-first creator uploading your first series, YouTube holds all content publishers to the same standards. Community Guidelines are enforced platform-wide, regardless of a channel’s size, history, or market familiarity.

This presents a significant challenge for new entrants. Many first-time creators or distributors may be unaware that a thumbnail featuring misleading imagery, a prank involving minors, or a scene with unedited drug references can lead to demonetization or a channel strike. But YouTube’s enforcement is uniform: content that violates policy is subject to the same sanctions across the board.

SpherexAI helps level the playing field by equipping every content team—regardless of experience—with access to the same tools used by top studios. Its patented knowledge graph, built on over a decade of regulatory insight and expert human annotation, powers its AI models with unmatched precision. The result: faster reviews, greater accuracy, and fewer costly mistakes.

Cross-Platform, Region-Aware, and Regulation-Ready

Unlike tools focused on metadata or age ratings alone, SpherexAI delivers:

  • Granular analysis: Scene-by-scene breakdowns for violence, vulgarity, sexual content, and self-harm risks.
  • Cultural intelligence: Predictive models assess content suitability across 240+ territories using Spherex’s proprietary “cultural distance” framework.
  • Workflow integration: The platform’s API allows integration into existing supply chains and CMS platforms for automated review at scale.

Reducing Risk, Unlocking Revenue

YouTube’s monetization eligibility hinges on content safety. Channels can be demonetized or de-prioritized in search and recommendation if flagged for repeated violations. Well-known creators Logan Paul, ScreenCulture, and LH Studios have all been sanctioned for violations. By proactively identifying and resolving compliance issues before publishing, SpherexAI empowers content owners to:

  • Avoid strikes or takedowns
  • Retain monetization rights
  • Accelerate time-to-market
  • Protect brand reputation

Conclusion

YouTube is a dynamic platform for global content distribution that requires rigorous adherence to evolving content standards. For studios, broadcasters, and new creators alike, SpherexAI offers an AI-powered safety net automating policy compliance while preserving creative integrity. When SpherexAI is integrated into your production workflow, you can publish confidently at scale, with full compliance, and with no brand risk.

Ready to streamline compliance and expand your YouTube strategy globally?

Book a demo or visit spherex.com to learn how SpherexAI can support your team.

Read Now

Spherex CEO Teresa Phillips Talks Practical AI for Global Content Localization at EnTech Fest

At this year’s DEG EnTech Fest, Spherex CEO and Co-Founder Teresa Phillips joined a panel to explore one of the most practical and impactful uses of AI in entertainment today: localization.

During the session titled “Practical AI For Speed and Savings in Localization,” Phillips shared how Spherex is leveraging AI to deliver “deep video understanding” that accelerates compliance and rating decisions in over 200 markets. As she explained, understanding the context—cultural, visual, and narrative—is crucial in determining whether a piece of content is suitable for audiences worldwide.

“AI can now detect not just what happens in a scene, but how it might be interpreted in different cultural and regulatory environments,” said Phillips. For example, in Scandinavian countries, if a trusted figure, such as a clergy member, commits an unethical act onscreen, it can dramatically impact a film’s age rating. SpherexAI is trained to identify these nuanced moments, flagging them for human review when needed.

Phillips also highlighted the role of AI in augmenting human decision-making, noting that “AI agents can be trained to ask humans the right questions—like whether the drinking in a scene is casual or excessive—ensuring more consistent, scalable evaluations.”

The conversation also acknowledged the broader industry shift that AI is bringing to localization workflows—from quality control (QC) to artwork generation, compliance, and project management. With automation poised to displace some entry-level roles, Phillips raised a key question for the future: “If junior roles are the first to be automated, how do we bring new talent into the industry? We have a responsibility in our organizations to create opportunities for the next generation.”

Joining Phillips on the panel were Silviu Epure (Blu Digital Group), Chris Carey (Iyuno), Kelly Summers (The Sherlock Company), and Duncan Wain (Zoo Digital), offering a 360° view on how AI is transforming the way stories cross borders.

Read Now