← Back To All Posts
Date:
December 3, 2021

Film Classifications Explained: A Guide to Age Ratings

You may be familiar with seeing a large 'PG' or 'R' flash on your screen before a movie begins. Most have a general idea of what these age ratings mean and how they indicate the appropriateness of a film's content. However, they may not understand the process or the criteria for how movies are classified. Today, most movies are released on multiple online platforms and movie theaters simultaneously. As a result, worldwide audiences have more access to internationally produced content than ever before, so understanding age ratings for films is more important than ever. This post discusses US film ratings are determined, explains the different movie classifications, and how they are essential in international distribution.

Why Are There Movie Ratings?

In the United States, the MPAA (Motion Picture Association of America), an industry, non-governmental organization, created the current rating system in 1968. It is designed to educate and inform parents to make appropriate movie-viewing choices for their children and families and provide a unified classification of film titles. This system was created to prevent the film industry from simply denying a film's distribution based on a set of moral standards on which not everyone may agree.

Many countries, including some of the world's largest movie markets, utilize governmental censors or regulators to provide age ratings. Unlike the US, where the banning of films is extremely rare, movies and TV shows are routinely censored or banned in countries like China, Russia, Malaysia, and several Middle Eastern countries.

What are the Ratings Used in Film Classifications?

Content is classified for audience suitability based on several factors. Most countries have a unique set of ratings, possibly none, but many classification systems look at similar influencing factors to determine an age rating. Elements such as language, sex, nudity, drug use, violence, horror, discrimination, and other dangerous behavior are common citations for different age ratings.

The same five movie age ratings in the United States have been in place since 1990 when the NC-17 rating was introduced to replace the former X-rating. We detail the individual ratings below.

General Audiences (G): This rating is generally viewed as accessible for all ages. Ideally, this rating is given to a movie deemed appropriate enough for children to watch without any permission or guidance from parents or adult guardians.

Parental Guidance Suggested (PG): With PG ratings, a parent may or may not need to make a judgment call if the material is suitable for their children. Typically, PG films may include animated violence or language that may not be suitable for younger children. In this case, a parent may accompany a child to a viewing at a movie theater.

Parents Strongly Cautioned (PG-13): This rating may be newer than you realized, having been created in 1984 to alert parents of slightly intense content. This rating gets the name PG-13 as it suggests the movie may not be appropriate for pre-teenage children. Themes such as stronger language and more graphic violence or horror may be prevalent in films with PG-13 ratings. Parents should be cautious and accompany children under 13 to see a movie with this rating.

Restricted (R): A movie with an R rating will certainly contain adult content. This means parents would be wise to learn more about the film before deciding whether to allow a child to accompany them to watch this movie. Anyone under 17 needs a parent or adult guardian present to be admitted to a film screening.

No One 17 and Under Admitted (NC-17): NC-17 ratings flag parents the movie in question is clearly for adult eyes only, and children will not be permitted to any movie theater showings, regardless of granted adult permission or not. Whereas other movie ratings allow parents to choose what their children get to see, the NC-17 rating was proposed by the National Association of Theater Owners (NATO) to prevent legal action from happening.

It is not a requirement for films or TV shows to be submitted for a rating in the US—unless they seek commercial release. A movie is labeled as unrated (UR) or not rated (NR) if no rating is sought or available. This is not common. While some filmmakers may elect not to have their films rated, they significantly reduce the work's commercial and financial opportunities. Many platforms and theaters refuse to exhibit unrated, or NC-17 films (mostly because there is little market for them), and many online platform search algorithms automatically exclude such content in their results.

How Are U.S. Movie Ratings Determined?

The MPAA ratings board consists of three MPAA staff "senior raters" and no more than ten anonymous parental members, all with kids between the ages of five and 15. Members are limited to seven year terms, or until their youngest child turns 21, whichever comes first. These board members make up a group known as the Classification and Rating Administration (CARA). Members view submitted films, discuss their thoughts, and vote on a final rating. The findings are then reported to a producer of the film. The determined rating can always be disputed by the filmmaker or re-submitted once appropriate edits are made to adjust the movie's rating before release. An appeals board can overturn rating decisions by a majority vote.

Ratings are established for the life of the film. Only in cases where revisions are made, additional content added (e.g., a "Director's Cut"), country regulatory edits are required, or the producer appeals will the MPAA reconsider re-rating a film.

For example, the MPAA originally wanted to rate Steven Spielberg's 1984 film "Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom" with an "R" rating due to the graphic depiction of a beating heart torn from a man's chest and child slavery. Spielberg argued an "R" was too restrictive while acknowledging the film's PG rating caused difficulty for many parents given the content. He called on the MPAA to create a new rating between PG and R. The MPAA obliged, creating the PG-13 rating.

Spherex: Localized Age Ratings Services Provider

As the industry authority on local age ratings globally, our mission at Spherex is to inspire a more tolerant and harmonious world, one story at a time. When it comes to movies and TV shows, one size does not fit all. To assist filmmakers in reaching international audiences, Spherex has introduced a first-of-its-kind technology that culturally adapts content for markets worldwide to increase engagement, drive more revenue faster, and avoid legal and regulatory risk. Known as Spherex greenlight™ this technology provides content creators with the information they need to tailor their title to fit any appropriate age rating and find their best market.

Take the guesswork out of film classification and the risk out of international expansion. Contact us today!

Related Insights

YouTube Thumbnails Can Get You in Trouble

Here’s Why Creators Should Pay Attention

When we talk about content compliance on YouTube, most people think of the video content itself — what’s said, what’s shown, and how it’s edited. But there’s another part of the video that carries serious consequences if it violates YouTube policy: the thumbnail.

Thumbnails aren’t just visual hooks — they’re promos and they’re subject to the same content policies as videos. According to YouTube’s official guidelines, thumbnails that contain nudity, sexual content, violent imagery, misleading visuals, or vulgar language can be removed, age-restricted, or lead to a strike on your channel. Repeat offenses can even result in demonetization or channel termination. That’s a steep price to pay for what some may think of as a simple promotional image.

The Hidden Risk in a Single Frame

The challenge? The thumbnail is often selected from the video itself — either manually or auto-generated from a frame. Creators under tight deadlines or managing high-volume channels may not take the time to double-check every frame. They may let the platform choose it automatically. This is where things get risky.

A few seconds of unblurred nudity, a fleeting violent scene, or a misleading expression of shock might seem harmless in motion. But when captured as a still image, those same moments can trigger YouTube’s moderation systems — or worse, violate the platform’s Community Guidelines.

Let’s say your video includes a horror scene with simulated gore. It might pass YouTube’s rules with an age restriction. But if the thumbnail zooms in on a blood-splattered face, that thumbnail could be removed, and your channel could be penalized. Even thumbnails that are simply “too suggestive” or “misleading” can get flagged.

Misleading Thumbnails: Not Just Clickbait — a Violation

Another common mistake is using a thumbnail that implies something the video doesn’t deliver — for example, suggesting nudity, shocking violence, or sexually explicit content that never appears in the video. These aren’t just bad for audience trust; they’re a clear violation of YouTube’s thumbnail policy.

Even if your content is compliant, the wrong thumbnail can cause very real problems.

The Reality for Content Creators

It’s essential to recognize that YouTube’s thumbnail policy doesn’t exist in isolation. It intersects with other rules around child safety, nudity, vulgar language, violence, and more. A thumbnail with vulgar text, even if the video is educational or satirical, may still result in age restrictions or removal. A still frame with a suggestive pose, even if brief and unintended in the video itself, can be enough to get flagged.

And for creators monetizing their work, especially across multiple markets, the risk goes beyond visibility. A flagged thumbnail can reduce ad eligibility, limit reach, or cut off monetization entirely. Worse, a pattern of violations can threaten a channel’s long-term viability.

What’s a Creator to Do?

First, you need to know how to spot the problem and then know what to do about it. Second, you need to know if the changes you make might affect its acceptance in other markets or countries. Only then can you manually scrub through your video looking for risky frames. You can review policies and try to stay up to date on the nuances of what YouTube considers “gratifying” versus “educational” or “documentary.” But doing this at scale — especially for a growing content library — is overwhelming.  

That’s where a tool like SpherexAI can help.

A Smarter Way to Stay Compliant

SpherexAI uses frame-level and scene-level analysis to flag potential compliance issues — not just in your video, but in any frame that could be selected as a thumbnail. Using its patented knowledge graph, which includes every published regulatory and platform rule, it will prepare detailed and accurate edit decision lists that tell you not only what the problem is, but also for each of your target audiences. Whether you're publishing to a single audience or distributing globally, SpherexAI checks your content against YouTube’s policies and localized cultural standards.

For creators trying to grow their brand, monetize their work, and stay in good standing with platforms, that kind of precision can mean the difference between success and a takedown notice.

Want to know if your content is at risk? Learn how SpherexAI can help you protect your channel and optimize every frame — including the thumbnail. Contact us to learn more.

Read Now

Automating Peace of Mind: Navigating YouTube's Global Guidelines with SpherexAI

For media companies distributing content across YouTube, compliance is no longer just a legal requirement—it’s a prerequisite for discoverability, monetization, and channel survival. YouTube enforces strict policies governing child safety, vulgarity, graphic content, and cultural sensitivity. For content owners, ensuring compliance across multiple categories and geographies is a complex and labor-intensive process. To address this issue, SpherexAI provides a scalable solution tailored for any content creator or owner.

YouTube’s Expanding Compliance Landscape

YouTube’s Community Guidelines cover a wide array of regulated categories. Content can be removed or age-restricted—and creators may face penalties—if videos violate policies on:

  • Nudity and sexual content: Content that includes sexually gratifying imagery or non-consensual sexualization is prohibited.
  • Violence and graphic imagery: Footage showing serious injury, bodily fluids, or torture intended to shock viewers can be flagged or removed.
  • Child safety: Content that exploits minors, includes inappropriate family content, or features children in dangerous stunts is not allowed.
  • Illegal or regulated goods: YouTube restricts promotion of firearms, narcotics, and gambling services, among others.

Managing compliance with each of these categories—especially when content is global and multilingual—is a logistical challenge for distributors.

Enter SpherexAI: Precision Compliance Automation at Scale

SpherexAI applies multimodal AI to analyze video content across dialogue, visuals, audio, and metadata. It detects compliance issues not only by scanning for policy violations but also by identifying subtle cultural or regional sensitivities that could result in content removal or limited distribution.

For example, the platform flags:

  • Dialogue with excessive profanity or sexual references, aligned with YouTube’s vulgar language policy.
  • Visuals showing partial nudity, firearm use, or dangerous stunts, which may trigger strikes or age restrictions.
  • Culturally sensitive depictions—such as religious imagery or portrayals of death—that may violate local norms and platform rules.

SpherexAI outputs include timestamped alerts and severity levels, allowing content owners to make targeted edits rather than performing full manual reviews.

Equal Rules for All Creators

Whether you’re a major studio releasing film clips or a digital-first creator uploading your first series, YouTube holds all content publishers to the same standards. Community Guidelines are enforced platform-wide, regardless of a channel’s size, history, or market familiarity.

This presents a significant challenge for new entrants. Many first-time creators or distributors may be unaware that a thumbnail featuring misleading imagery, a prank involving minors, or a scene with unedited drug references can lead to demonetization or a channel strike. But YouTube’s enforcement is uniform: content that violates policy is subject to the same sanctions across the board.

SpherexAI helps level the playing field by equipping every content team—regardless of experience—with access to the same tools used by top studios. Its patented knowledge graph, built on over a decade of regulatory insight and expert human annotation, powers its AI models with unmatched precision. The result: faster reviews, greater accuracy, and fewer costly mistakes.

Cross-Platform, Region-Aware, and Regulation-Ready

Unlike tools focused on metadata or age ratings alone, SpherexAI delivers:

  • Granular analysis: Scene-by-scene breakdowns for violence, vulgarity, sexual content, and self-harm risks.
  • Cultural intelligence: Predictive models assess content suitability across 240+ territories using Spherex’s proprietary “cultural distance” framework.
  • Workflow integration: The platform’s API allows integration into existing supply chains and CMS platforms for automated review at scale.

Reducing Risk, Unlocking Revenue

YouTube’s monetization eligibility hinges on content safety. Channels can be demonetized or de-prioritized in search and recommendation if flagged for repeated violations. Well-known creators Logan Paul, ScreenCulture, and LH Studios have all been sanctioned for violations. By proactively identifying and resolving compliance issues before publishing, SpherexAI empowers content owners to:

  • Avoid strikes or takedowns
  • Retain monetization rights
  • Accelerate time-to-market
  • Protect brand reputation

Conclusion

YouTube is a dynamic platform for global content distribution that requires rigorous adherence to evolving content standards. For studios, broadcasters, and new creators alike, SpherexAI offers an AI-powered safety net automating policy compliance while preserving creative integrity. When SpherexAI is integrated into your production workflow, you can publish confidently at scale, with full compliance, and with no brand risk.

Ready to streamline compliance and expand your YouTube strategy globally?

Book a demo or visit spherex.com to learn how SpherexAI can support your team.

Read Now

Spherex CEO Teresa Phillips Talks Practical AI for Global Content Localization at EnTech Fest

At this year’s DEG EnTech Fest, Spherex CEO and Co-Founder Teresa Phillips joined a panel to explore one of the most practical and impactful uses of AI in entertainment today: localization.

During the session titled “Practical AI For Speed and Savings in Localization,” Phillips shared how Spherex is leveraging AI to deliver “deep video understanding” that accelerates compliance and rating decisions in over 200 markets. As she explained, understanding the context—cultural, visual, and narrative—is crucial in determining whether a piece of content is suitable for audiences worldwide.

“AI can now detect not just what happens in a scene, but how it might be interpreted in different cultural and regulatory environments,” said Phillips. For example, in Scandinavian countries, if a trusted figure, such as a clergy member, commits an unethical act onscreen, it can dramatically impact a film’s age rating. SpherexAI is trained to identify these nuanced moments, flagging them for human review when needed.

Phillips also highlighted the role of AI in augmenting human decision-making, noting that “AI agents can be trained to ask humans the right questions—like whether the drinking in a scene is casual or excessive—ensuring more consistent, scalable evaluations.”

The conversation also acknowledged the broader industry shift that AI is bringing to localization workflows—from quality control (QC) to artwork generation, compliance, and project management. With automation poised to displace some entry-level roles, Phillips raised a key question for the future: “If junior roles are the first to be automated, how do we bring new talent into the industry? We have a responsibility in our organizations to create opportunities for the next generation.”

Joining Phillips on the panel were Silviu Epure (Blu Digital Group), Chris Carey (Iyuno), Kelly Summers (The Sherlock Company), and Duncan Wain (Zoo Digital), offering a 360° view on how AI is transforming the way stories cross borders.

Read Now