← Back To All Posts
Date:
November 24, 2021

The First Thanksgiving: When Translation Made History

Did you know the first Thanksgiving ever celebrated in the U.S. occurred 400 years ago this year? If you didn't, then don't feel bad. Most Americans couldn't tell you when or where it happened or why the natives attended in the first place. The vital lesson of that first celebration is that despite different cultures and traditions that are a literal world apart, overcoming language and cultural barriers can lead to productive relationships amongst people worth celebrating. Those lessons are as valid today as they were then, and we should be thankful for them.

The first recorded celebration happened at a place known as the Plymouth Plantation in 1621 . It was a continuation of an English tradition of taking time to celebrate that year's harvest. There was no formal name for it at the time; they just picked a day, had a feast, and that was it. There was a thing called "Thanksgiving," but that was a day of religious prayer and fasting; yes, fasting as in not eating, and it first occurred in 1623. So how, you may ask, did two celebrations, where during one you feast and the other you fast, turn into a day for overeating? It's a fascinating story.

To summarize, the Puritans left England for the Netherlands in 1609 to avoid religious persecution by leaders of the Anglican Church under King James I. After several years in the Netherlands and to establish a community of like-minded families, a group of what we now know as "pilgrims" left the Netherlands for the New World. Their goal was to begin life anew, embracing their own culture, religion, and rules. After several failed attempts to depart, the Mayflower sailed into Cape Cod on November 21, 1620.

Their delayed departure meant the pilgrims arrived too late in the year to plant their crops. As a direct result, and because they had no established trade channels to replenish supplies, about half of the original 102 pilgrims died due to starvation or disease over the next several months. It became clear that if they were to survive, they needed help.

According to Edward Winslow's account, as told in " Mourt's Relation ," members of the Wampanoag tribe, who were the pilgrim's immediate native neighbors, first approached them to establish a peaceful relationship in late March 1621. The tribe's leader, Massasoit, understood the politics of their arrival and the effect a recent epidemic of European origin had on the stability of his society . He needed the pilgrims, and they needed him. The two groups negotiated an agreement whereby they live amongst each other peaceably, relying on each other for support based on respecting their land and property and providing mutual defense and trade opportunities.

So how did they negotiate an agreement if they didn't share a language? Ask most Americans this question and the answer you're likely to hear if they have one, is they pointed, acted out what they wanted to communicate, and taught each other bits of their language. Given the time from their first introduction to the first celebration was a matter of months, it's unlikely that's what happened. The truth is more surprising: they had translators.

The Wampanoag had two people who spoke understandable English. The first, a tribal member named Samoset, learned it from dealing with Europeans who had been visiting and trading with them for many years. The other, a prisoner of the tribe, a Patuxet Indian named Tisquantum (also known as "Squanto"), learned English after being captured by an Englishman named Thomas Hunt in 1614 and spending several years in England before returning home in 1618.

Samoset made the first contact with the pilgrims and was later joined by Squanto. Squanto was freed only after demonstrating his skill in accurately translating the dialogue between the pilgrim leader and Massasoit. Squanto also endeared himself to the pilgrims by teaching them local agricultural techniques and other tricks for living on the edge of a wilderness.

As Winslow wrote, "We have found the Indians very faithful in their Covenant of Peace with us… and we, for our parts, walk as peaceably and safely in the woods here as in the highways in England." The agreement's success, which created peace between the Wampanoag and the Mayflower pilgrims that lasted a generation, was due to a recognition that two peoples from different cultures and languages needed each other. What's important and often overlooked is who reached out in the first place.

It wasn't the pilgrims who saw the importance of the situation and reached out to the natives; it was the Wampanoag. It wasn't the pilgrims who tried to learn the tribal language; the Wampanoag learned English. The bottom line is were it not for the Wampanoag's outreach to the pilgrims, their use of translators to communicate effectively, their willingness to teach the pilgrims how to grow crops; there may not have been a crop that fall to celebrate as the remaining 53 colonists may not have survived the winter. Were it not for language translators 400 years ago, we may not be celebrating Thanksgiving today. Were it not for Wampanoag translators, the Fourth Thursday in November would be just another day.

Related Insights

The Global Rules of Content Are Changing

Across the past eight issues of Spherex’s weekly World M&E News newsletter, one theme has become undeniable: regulation, censorship, and compliance are rewriting the rules of global media. From AI policy to platform accountability, from creative freedom to cultural oversight, content creation is now inseparable from compliance.

1. Platforms Tighten Control Through Age and Safety Laws

U.S. states such as Wyoming and South Dakota have enacted age-verification laws that mirror strict internet safety rules already seen in the U.K., signaling a broader legislative trend toward restricting access to mature material.

At the same time, Saudi Arabia’s audiovisual regulator ordered Roblox to suspend chat functions and hire Arabic moderators to protect minors—an example of government-imposed moderation replacing voluntary compliance.

Elsewhere, Instagram’s PG-13 policy update illustrates how platforms are preemptively adapting before new government rules arrive.

2. Censorship Expands — Even as Its Methods Evolve

Censorship remains pervasive but increasingly localized. India’s Central Board of Film Certification demanded one minute, 55 seconds of cuts from They Call Him OG, removing what they considered violent imagery and nudity.

In China, the horror film Together was digitally altered so that a gay couple became straight using AI. Responding to Malaysia’s stricter limits on sexual or suggestive content, censors excised a “swimming pool” scene from Chainsaw Man – The Movie.

Israel’s culture minister threatened to pull funding from the Ophir national film awards after a Palestinian-themed film about a 12-year-old boy won best picture.

3. AI and Content Creation: Between Innovation and Oversight

AI remains both catalyst and controversy. Netflix announced new internal policies limiting how AI can be used in production to protect creative rights and data ownership.

OpenAI’s decision to allow adult content on ChatGPT under “freedom of expression” principles sparked industry debate about whether platforms or creators set the moral boundaries of AI. OpenAI’s CEO Sam Altman emphasized in a statement, the company is “not the moral police.”

Meanwhile, California passed the Digital Likeness Protection Act to combat unauthorized use of celebrity images in AI-generated ads.

4. Governments Target Global Platforms

The Indonesian government is advancing a sweeping plan to filter content on Netflix, YouTube, Disney+ Hotstar, and others using audience-specific content suitability metrics.

At the same time, the U.K. and EU are reexamining long-standing broadcast rules, with Sweden’s telecom authority proposing the deregulation of domestic broadcasting to encourage competition.

These diverging approaches—tightening in one market, loosening in another—underscore the growing fragmentation of global compliance standards.

5. Compliance as Competitive Advantage

The real shift is strategic: companies now see compliance as value creation, not red tape. As Spherex has argued in recent Substack articles, The Hidden Costs of Non-Compliance in Video Content Production and Why Content Differentiation Matters More Than Ever, studios and creators who anticipate regulatory complexity and make necessary edits on their terms while remaining true to their stories can reach more markets and larger audiences with fewer risks.

In other words, understanding compliance early has become the difference between limited release and global scale.

Conclusion

From new age-verification laws to AI disclosure acts and streaming filters, regulation now defines the boundaries of creativity. The next evolution of media will belong to those who can move fastest within those boundaries—leveraging compliance not as constraint but as clarity.

Read Now

Spherex Wins MarTech Breakthrough Award for Best AI-Powered Ad Targeting Solution

The annual MarTech Breakthrough Awards are conducted by MarTech Breakthrough, a leading market intelligence organization that recognizes the world’s most innovative marketing, sales, and advertising technology companies. 

This year’s program attracted over 4,000 nominations from across the globe, with winners representing the most innovative solutions in the industry. This year’s roster includes Adobe, HubSpot, Sprout Social, Cision, ZoomInfo, Optimizely, Sitecore, and other top technology leaders, alongside in-house martech innovations from companies such as Verizon and Capital One.

At the heart of this win is SpherexAI, our multimodal platform that powers contextual ad targeting at the scene level. By analyzing video content across visual, audio, dialogue, and emotional signals, SpherexAI enables advertisers to deliver messages at the most impactful moments. Combined with our Cultural Knowledge Graph, the platform ensures campaigns resonate authentically across more than 200 countries and territories while maintaining cultural sensitivity and brand safety.

“Spherex is leveraging its expertise in video compliance to help advertisers navigate the complexities of brand safety and monetization,” Teresa Phillips, CEO of Spherex, said in a statement. “SpherexAI is the only solution that blends scene-level intelligence with deep cultural and emotional insights, giving advertisers a powerful tool to ensure strategic ad placement and engagement.”

This recognition underscores Spherex’s commitment to building the next generation of AI solutions where cultural intelligence, relevance, and brand safety define success. The award also highlights the growing importance of cultural intelligence in global advertising. As audiences consume more content across borders and devices, brands need solutions that go beyond surface-level targeting to connect meaningfully with viewers. SpherexAI provides that bridge, empowering advertisers to scale campaigns that are not only effective but also contextually relevant and culturally respectful.

Read Now

YouTube Thumbnails Can Get You in Trouble

Here’s Why Creators Should Pay Attention

When we talk about content compliance on YouTube, most people think of the video content itself — what’s said, what’s shown, and how it’s edited. But there’s another part of the video that carries serious consequences if it violates YouTube policy: the thumbnail.

Thumbnails aren’t just visual hooks — they’re promos and they’re subject to the same content policies as videos. According to YouTube’s official guidelines, thumbnails that contain nudity, sexual content, violent imagery, misleading visuals, or vulgar language can be removed, age-restricted, or lead to a strike on your channel. Repeat offenses can even result in demonetization or channel termination. That’s a steep price to pay for what some may think of as a simple promotional image.

The Hidden Risk in a Single Frame

The challenge? The thumbnail is often selected from the video itself — either manually or auto-generated from a frame. Creators under tight deadlines or managing high-volume channels may not take the time to double-check every frame. They may let the platform choose it automatically. This is where things get risky.

A few seconds of unblurred nudity, a fleeting violent scene, or a misleading expression of shock might seem harmless in motion. But when captured as a still image, those same moments can trigger YouTube’s moderation systems — or worse, violate the platform’s Community Guidelines.

Let’s say your video includes a horror scene with simulated gore. It might pass YouTube’s rules with an age restriction. But if the thumbnail zooms in on a blood-splattered face, that thumbnail could be removed, and your channel could be penalized. Even thumbnails that are simply “too suggestive” or “misleading” can get flagged.

Misleading Thumbnails: Not Just Clickbait — a Violation

Another common mistake is using a thumbnail that implies something the video doesn’t deliver — for example, suggesting nudity, shocking violence, or sexually explicit content that never appears in the video. These aren’t just bad for audience trust; they’re a clear violation of YouTube’s thumbnail policy.

Even if your content is compliant, the wrong thumbnail can cause very real problems.

The Reality for Content Creators

It’s essential to recognize that YouTube’s thumbnail policy doesn’t exist in isolation. It intersects with other rules around child safety, nudity, vulgar language, violence, and more. A thumbnail with vulgar text, even if the video is educational or satirical, may still result in age restrictions or removal. A still frame with a suggestive pose, even if brief and unintended in the video itself, can be enough to get flagged.

And for creators monetizing their work, especially across multiple markets, the risk goes beyond visibility. A flagged thumbnail can reduce ad eligibility, limit reach, or cut off monetization entirely. Worse, a pattern of violations can threaten a channel’s long-term viability.

What’s a Creator to Do?

First, you need to know how to spot the problem and then know what to do about it. Second, you need to know if the changes you make might affect its acceptance in other markets or countries. Only then can you manually scrub through your video looking for risky frames. You can review policies and try to stay up to date on the nuances of what YouTube considers “gratifying” versus “educational” or “documentary.” But doing this at scale — especially for a growing content library — is overwhelming.  

That’s where a tool like SpherexAI can help.

A Smarter Way to Stay Compliant

SpherexAI uses frame-level and scene-level analysis to flag potential compliance issues — not just in your video, but in any frame that could be selected as a thumbnail. Using its patented knowledge graph, which includes every published regulatory and platform rule, it will prepare detailed and accurate edit decision lists that tell you not only what the problem is, but also for each of your target audiences. Whether you're publishing to a single audience or distributing globally, SpherexAI checks your content against YouTube’s policies and localized cultural standards.

For creators trying to grow their brand, monetize their work, and stay in good standing with platforms, that kind of precision can mean the difference between success and a takedown notice.

Want to know if your content is at risk? Learn how SpherexAI can help you protect your channel and optimize every frame — including the thumbnail. Contact us to learn more.

Read Now