← Back To All Posts
Date:
January 14, 2022

TV Ratings vs. Movie Ratings: What's the Difference?

As professionals involved in the Media and Entertainment (M&E) industry, we’re sure you are aware there are separate ratings for US film and TV content. What you may not be aware of are the differences between the two. This post will highlight these differences and describe how they impact the audience as content is distributed across various platforms.


The Basics

Ratings exist to inform parents and audiences about the appropriateness of content for their children and families. The problem ratings attempt to solve is that exposure to violent, sexual, adult, or suggestive language content can be harmful or offensive to specific audiences. Ratings provide a warning that those events are part of the production. Age is the primary determinant in assigning a rating, but presumed maturity within a rating category (e.g., PG vs. PG-13) may also be a factor. In other countries, criticism of the government, unflattering depictions of cultural norms, or negatively describing religion are grounds for content to be assigned higher age ratings or even banned. Those factors are not typically an issue with US age ratings for film or TV.


The first thing to understand is the fundamental difference in the purpose, type, and reach between the two platforms. Movie ratings were established for the content shown in movie theaters. TV ratings were created for content displayed on TV screens. The similarity is content; the difference is paid admission versus 24/7 access in our living rooms. The former is controlled access by requiring payment for a ticket, and the latter may not be controlled at all. Parents can be in the audience with a child in a theater but might be away while the show is on the living room TV. As a result, content notification requirements are more granular and specific for TV ratings than for film.


For example, there is no need for a comparable TV-Y or TV-Y7 rating in theaters because a G-rated film easily encompasses and addresses the guidance those ratings provide. Likewise, there is no market for NC-17 content on linear TV or streaming platforms, so TV has no comparable rating.


The next thing to understand is two different groups developed the US ratings systems. The Motion Picture Association ( MPA ), an industry trade group, developed US film ratings in 1968. Occasional updates have reflected changes in types of content, such as the introduction of the PG-13 rating following the release of an Indiana Jones film. We have previously written about this in more detail here .


Television ratings were developed and maintained by the TV Parental Guidelines Monitoring Board, also an industry trade group, in 1996. Its members include the MPA, the National Association of Broadcasters ( NAB ), the Internet and Television Association ( NCTA ), and five public interest groups. Their interests are related, but their ratings differ at the top and bottom of the age scale. TV ratings were created as a voluntary system following concerns expressed by the US Congress and complaints made to the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) about objectionable TV content being aired without notice to parents. TV programs are self-rated by the networks or platforms in the US system.


The Ratings Matrix

Below is a comparison matrix that presents the difference between movie and TV ratings systems.


US TV ratings also contain "content descriptors” that specify specific types of potentially objectionable content. The elements within those descriptors are:


D – Suggestive dialogue (rarely used with TV-MA-rated programs)
L – Coarse language
S – Sexual content
V – Violence
FV – Fantasy violence (exclusive to TV-Y7-rated programs)


These elements are shown below the rating and displayed for 15 seconds at the program’s beginning and following any breaks.


Upon review, it’s clear that TV ratings closely resemble those used for movies; this is on purpose. The reason is to provide continuity and consistency for parents and regulators across all content distribution platforms, including theatrical, linear, retail, and online services. As a system, both have worked quite well and have served as a model for other countries worldwide who wish to provide consumers with helpful information about content and titles they may consider sharing with their children, families, and friends.


Spherex: Localized Age Ratings Services Provider

As the global industry authority and leading private provider of local age ratings worldwide, Spherex uniquely understands the importance of getting age ratings right, regardless of the platform. Spherexratings™ and Spherexgreenlight™ provide content creators with the necessary knowledge to tailor titles to fit any age rating and identify their best markets. Greenlight™ is a first-of-its-kind AI/ML technology that culturally adapts content for markets worldwide. With this technology, content creators can increase engagement, drive more revenue faster, and avoid legal and regulatory risks.


Take the guesswork and risk out of international expansion. Contact us today!


Related Insights

The Global Rules of Content Are Changing

Across the past eight issues of Spherex’s weekly World M&E News newsletter, one theme has become undeniable: regulation, censorship, and compliance are rewriting the rules of global media. From AI policy to platform accountability, from creative freedom to cultural oversight, content creation is now inseparable from compliance.

1. Platforms Tighten Control Through Age and Safety Laws

U.S. states such as Wyoming and South Dakota have enacted age-verification laws that mirror strict internet safety rules already seen in the U.K., signaling a broader legislative trend toward restricting access to mature material.

At the same time, Saudi Arabia’s audiovisual regulator ordered Roblox to suspend chat functions and hire Arabic moderators to protect minors—an example of government-imposed moderation replacing voluntary compliance.

Elsewhere, Instagram’s PG-13 policy update illustrates how platforms are preemptively adapting before new government rules arrive.

2. Censorship Expands — Even as Its Methods Evolve

Censorship remains pervasive but increasingly localized. India’s Central Board of Film Certification demanded one minute, 55 seconds of cuts from They Call Him OG, removing what they considered violent imagery and nudity.

In China, the horror film Together was digitally altered so that a gay couple became straight using AI. Responding to Malaysia’s stricter limits on sexual or suggestive content, censors excised a “swimming pool” scene from Chainsaw Man – The Movie.

Israel’s culture minister threatened to pull funding from the Ophir national film awards after a Palestinian-themed film about a 12-year-old boy won best picture.

3. AI and Content Creation: Between Innovation and Oversight

AI remains both catalyst and controversy. Netflix announced new internal policies limiting how AI can be used in production to protect creative rights and data ownership.

OpenAI’s decision to allow adult content on ChatGPT under “freedom of expression” principles sparked industry debate about whether platforms or creators set the moral boundaries of AI. OpenAI’s CEO Sam Altman emphasized in a statement, the company is “not the moral police.”

Meanwhile, California passed the Digital Likeness Protection Act to combat unauthorized use of celebrity images in AI-generated ads.

4. Governments Target Global Platforms

The Indonesian government is advancing a sweeping plan to filter content on Netflix, YouTube, Disney+ Hotstar, and others using audience-specific content suitability metrics.

At the same time, the U.K. and EU are reexamining long-standing broadcast rules, with Sweden’s telecom authority proposing the deregulation of domestic broadcasting to encourage competition.

These diverging approaches—tightening in one market, loosening in another—underscore the growing fragmentation of global compliance standards.

5. Compliance as Competitive Advantage

The real shift is strategic: companies now see compliance as value creation, not red tape. As Spherex has argued in recent Substack articles, The Hidden Costs of Non-Compliance in Video Content Production and Why Content Differentiation Matters More Than Ever, studios and creators who anticipate regulatory complexity and make necessary edits on their terms while remaining true to their stories can reach more markets and larger audiences with fewer risks.

In other words, understanding compliance early has become the difference between limited release and global scale.

Conclusion

From new age-verification laws to AI disclosure acts and streaming filters, regulation now defines the boundaries of creativity. The next evolution of media will belong to those who can move fastest within those boundaries—leveraging compliance not as constraint but as clarity.

Read Now

Spherex Wins MarTech Breakthrough Award for Best AI-Powered Ad Targeting Solution

The annual MarTech Breakthrough Awards are conducted by MarTech Breakthrough, a leading market intelligence organization that recognizes the world’s most innovative marketing, sales, and advertising technology companies. 

This year’s program attracted over 4,000 nominations from across the globe, with winners representing the most innovative solutions in the industry. This year’s roster includes Adobe, HubSpot, Sprout Social, Cision, ZoomInfo, Optimizely, Sitecore, and other top technology leaders, alongside in-house martech innovations from companies such as Verizon and Capital One.

At the heart of this win is SpherexAI, our multimodal platform that powers contextual ad targeting at the scene level. By analyzing video content across visual, audio, dialogue, and emotional signals, SpherexAI enables advertisers to deliver messages at the most impactful moments. Combined with our Cultural Knowledge Graph, the platform ensures campaigns resonate authentically across more than 200 countries and territories while maintaining cultural sensitivity and brand safety.

“Spherex is leveraging its expertise in video compliance to help advertisers navigate the complexities of brand safety and monetization,” Teresa Phillips, CEO of Spherex, said in a statement. “SpherexAI is the only solution that blends scene-level intelligence with deep cultural and emotional insights, giving advertisers a powerful tool to ensure strategic ad placement and engagement.”

This recognition underscores Spherex’s commitment to building the next generation of AI solutions where cultural intelligence, relevance, and brand safety define success. The award also highlights the growing importance of cultural intelligence in global advertising. As audiences consume more content across borders and devices, brands need solutions that go beyond surface-level targeting to connect meaningfully with viewers. SpherexAI provides that bridge, empowering advertisers to scale campaigns that are not only effective but also contextually relevant and culturally respectful.

Read Now

YouTube Thumbnails Can Get You in Trouble

Here’s Why Creators Should Pay Attention

When we talk about content compliance on YouTube, most people think of the video content itself — what’s said, what’s shown, and how it’s edited. But there’s another part of the video that carries serious consequences if it violates YouTube policy: the thumbnail.

Thumbnails aren’t just visual hooks — they’re promos and they’re subject to the same content policies as videos. According to YouTube’s official guidelines, thumbnails that contain nudity, sexual content, violent imagery, misleading visuals, or vulgar language can be removed, age-restricted, or lead to a strike on your channel. Repeat offenses can even result in demonetization or channel termination. That’s a steep price to pay for what some may think of as a simple promotional image.

The Hidden Risk in a Single Frame

The challenge? The thumbnail is often selected from the video itself — either manually or auto-generated from a frame. Creators under tight deadlines or managing high-volume channels may not take the time to double-check every frame. They may let the platform choose it automatically. This is where things get risky.

A few seconds of unblurred nudity, a fleeting violent scene, or a misleading expression of shock might seem harmless in motion. But when captured as a still image, those same moments can trigger YouTube’s moderation systems — or worse, violate the platform’s Community Guidelines.

Let’s say your video includes a horror scene with simulated gore. It might pass YouTube’s rules with an age restriction. But if the thumbnail zooms in on a blood-splattered face, that thumbnail could be removed, and your channel could be penalized. Even thumbnails that are simply “too suggestive” or “misleading” can get flagged.

Misleading Thumbnails: Not Just Clickbait — a Violation

Another common mistake is using a thumbnail that implies something the video doesn’t deliver — for example, suggesting nudity, shocking violence, or sexually explicit content that never appears in the video. These aren’t just bad for audience trust; they’re a clear violation of YouTube’s thumbnail policy.

Even if your content is compliant, the wrong thumbnail can cause very real problems.

The Reality for Content Creators

It’s essential to recognize that YouTube’s thumbnail policy doesn’t exist in isolation. It intersects with other rules around child safety, nudity, vulgar language, violence, and more. A thumbnail with vulgar text, even if the video is educational or satirical, may still result in age restrictions or removal. A still frame with a suggestive pose, even if brief and unintended in the video itself, can be enough to get flagged.

And for creators monetizing their work, especially across multiple markets, the risk goes beyond visibility. A flagged thumbnail can reduce ad eligibility, limit reach, or cut off monetization entirely. Worse, a pattern of violations can threaten a channel’s long-term viability.

What’s a Creator to Do?

First, you need to know how to spot the problem and then know what to do about it. Second, you need to know if the changes you make might affect its acceptance in other markets or countries. Only then can you manually scrub through your video looking for risky frames. You can review policies and try to stay up to date on the nuances of what YouTube considers “gratifying” versus “educational” or “documentary.” But doing this at scale — especially for a growing content library — is overwhelming.  

That’s where a tool like SpherexAI can help.

A Smarter Way to Stay Compliant

SpherexAI uses frame-level and scene-level analysis to flag potential compliance issues — not just in your video, but in any frame that could be selected as a thumbnail. Using its patented knowledge graph, which includes every published regulatory and platform rule, it will prepare detailed and accurate edit decision lists that tell you not only what the problem is, but also for each of your target audiences. Whether you're publishing to a single audience or distributing globally, SpherexAI checks your content against YouTube’s policies and localized cultural standards.

For creators trying to grow their brand, monetize their work, and stay in good standing with platforms, that kind of precision can mean the difference between success and a takedown notice.

Want to know if your content is at risk? Learn how SpherexAI can help you protect your channel and optimize every frame — including the thumbnail. Contact us to learn more.

Read Now